Gemini tracking
Gemini visibility tracker with repeated answers
Measure Gemini brand mentions, citations, competitor position, sentiment, and answer evidence across a stable set of buyer questions.
Short answer
refd repeats a fixed set of buyer questions in Gemini and scores the returned answer text and source URLs. It shows how often the brand appears, whether its domain is cited, who is named first, how the brand is described, and which evidence supports every aggregate.
Illustrative sample
Gemini visibility snapshot
Mention rate
61.0% Ultrahuman in answered sample cellsCitation rate
27.0% Answers citing ultrahuman.comAverage position
#2.0 Conditional on a brand mentionSamples per cell
2 Independent prompt observationsBuyer question
What are the best smart rings without a subscription?
Observed signal
Mentioned · cited · position 1
The answer leads with Ultrahuman and RingConn, then distinguishes the brands by recovery experience, price, and battery life.
Gemini is a distinct answer surface from Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews. They can use related Google technology, but they are different products with different interfaces, retrieval behavior, and source presentation. refd therefore measures them separately.
The Gemini tracker answers a narrow business question: when your selected buyer questions are asked, does Gemini name your brand, cite your domain, place a competitor first, and describe the brand in a way that can be audited?
What Gemini visibility means
Google’s Gemini Apps documentation states that Gemini may show sources and related content within or below a response. It also states that not every response includes source links.
That is why refd reports both citation rate and source coverage. A Gemini answer without a source URL can still be scored for visible brand mentions, position, prominence, and sentiment. It should not be presented as a cited answer.
What refd measures on Gemini
| Signal | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Mention rate | How often Gemini names the brand in eligible answers |
| Citation rate | How often a returned source URL belongs to a tracked brand or competitor |
| Average position | Which tracked entity is named first, second, or later when it appears |
| Share of voice | How the brand’s presence compares with the configured competitor set |
| Prominence | Whether the strongest mention is in the lead, body, or a list |
| Sentiment | Whether the context around a mention is positive, neutral, or negative |
| Source coverage | How often Gemini answers in the selected range expose at least one URL |
Position is conditional on a mention. An absent brand has no position, because mention rate already represents absence. This avoids inventing an arbitrary rank penalty.
Read the illustrative result
The fabricated sample asks for smart rings without a subscription. Gemini names Ultrahuman first and cites the brand domain. It also mentions RingConn and Oura, giving the user a compact competitive comparison.
The evidence reveals why the answer matters:
- Ultrahuman is associated with the subscription-free requirement.
- It appears before the other tracked brands.
- The brand’s own domain contributes source evidence.
- The answer differentiates competitors using recovery experience, price, battery life, and software maturity.
The aggregate mention rate alone cannot explain those associations. refd keeps the prompt, answer, position, sentiment, and URLs connected so the result can be reviewed instead of guessed from a score.
Track associations, not just appearances
For Gemini, useful buyer questions often expose the attributes attached to each brand:
- Best product for a specific use case.
- Products with or without a particular pricing model.
- Alternatives to a known category leader.
- Best option for a company size, region, or technical requirement.
- Tradeoffs between two named products.
- Requirements a buyer should evaluate before choosing.
A mention can still be strategically weak if the answer attaches the brand to the wrong audience, an outdated limitation, or a secondary position. Review the prose and source evidence before deciding that a high mention rate is a positive outcome.
Compare Gemini with the Google Search surfaces
Do not merge Gemini, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews into one “Google” metric. refd tracks each as a separate surface, and a Google AI Overview may be absent for a successful query.
The same prompt can produce different brands, sources, and wording on each surface. That difference is useful. It shows where a brand’s visibility is strong, weak, or dependent on one answer environment.
Limitations
Gemini responses are non-deterministic. Source availability, whether web search is used, location, prompt wording, product updates, and collection time can change the output.
Two repeated samples make disagreement visible but do not capture every answer a user could receive. refd records the tracked result for the configured country and time. It does not control Gemini’s retrieval decision or claim that a missing source URL means the answer had no outside influence.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini the same surface as Google AI Mode?
No. refd tracks Gemini and Google AI Mode separately because they are distinct products and can return different answers and sources.
Does every Gemini answer contain citations?
No. Google’s help documentation says sources and related links are not present for every response. refd reports only URLs returned in the collected evidence.
What happens when Gemini names a brand without citing it?
The result contributes to mention rate, position, prominence, sentiment, and mention share of voice. It contributes zero to that brand’s citation rate for the answer.
Sources reviewed
External product behavior was reviewed on 30 July 2026. The refd collection and metric descriptions match the open-source implementation on that date.
See your evidence